Posted on

What’s Wrong With

Extortion OK, Chargebacks Not

Last Friday, suddenly and without warning shut down our account.

We were a well established vendor on  In fact, we were consistently ranked a top-50 vendor of nearly 50,000 vendors in the Programming & Databases sector, reaching the top 25 at one point.  If we hadn’t opted to take on a major project outside of that kept us from doing new business there for most of the past year we’d have reached the top 10 with ease.

Surprise! You’re Done Here.

What was really surprising is that after 5 years of working with and being a top ranked vendor,  they terminated our account with no warning.  No email, no phone call, no communication of any kind.  We simply logged into the system in an effort to communicate with a client that we were working with and could not log in.

After ruling out technical issues we emailed  36  hours later they responded “you did a chargeback so we closed your accounts”.

Wait.  What chargeback?!

We called and got in touch with Julie, the customer service representative for freelancers. She said there was a chargeback of $690 on a Guru account for (we changed the name for the privacy of our client).   As we pointed out to Julie; was a company we knew quite well, we had just finished an 18 month stint there as interim CTO, but we are not

While working as CTO, we setup a employer account to assist in locating additional vendors to work on their project.  When setting up the account, we used the corporate American Express card that put in our name to facilitate purchases.   It was that very card, with our name on it as “CTO, LLC” that was the source of our problems.

Three months after  we finished our contract with, they had a problem with a transaction at Guru. THEY had requested a chargeback on their account, not us. We brought this to Julie’s attention but she either didn’t understand or didn’t care.

Extortion OK

It turns out another Guru vendor had extorted money from via the SafePay Escrow System.  Even though the money was in Escrow and it is against the Terms of Service, the vendor insisted that NO WORK would be released under any circumstances unless released $690 of a $2000 project.

Vendor Extortion Letter
Private DB Message:
– From: ABC Vendor (name changed) (Pro ID: 1063060)

– Project: Create Flash Homepage For New Website (Project ID: 568291)
How do you expect us to send you files without pre payment.

You know thats our only protection.

Here is the updated presentation, please download here (note: a demo file, not the work due).


The work  that was finally released turned out to be incomplete, sub-par, and not even close to the deliverables requested.   When asked for a refund from the vendor they basically said “too bad”. brought the complaint to and even had written extortion letters from the vendor.  Guru also said “too bad, you released the money, we won’t help you”., rightfully so, initiated a charge back through American Express.  Guru did NOT serve their best interest and after months of discussion refused to help, even though clear violations of the vendor and SafePay Escrow policy were evident. refused to assist in the matter so requested a chargeback as suggested by American Express.

The truly amazing part of all this is not only did refuse to assist with a clear case of extortion and violations of the Terms of Service, they allowed the other vendor to remain online as an active vendor in their system!  We know this because came to us for assistance after we had finished serving in the CTO role.    We researched the claim and lo-and-behold, the vendor was still online and now requesting funds up front to start projects from other potential clients.   Even more amazing was just a month ago the very same vendor bid on one of Cyber Sprocket’s projects we had posted through our employer account, bad feedback from other problem projects intact in their profile!

Chargebacks Are Not OK

So what happened next? got the chargeback for $690 from and immediately shut down ALL accounts associated in any way, shape or form with  This included Cyber Sprocket Labs, simply because our name appeared in both places.

Nevermind that is a separate entity owned by a different individual.  Nevermind that the credit card was an corporate card.   Who cares that the tax ID on file, the address, the company name, and the primary contacts had nothing to do with Cyber Sprocket.  Forget the fact that Cyber Sprocket Labs had perfect 5-of-5 star ratings in all categories on for the more than 5 years we were there.  We never had a chargeback, never a complaint, and brought more than $10,000 in revenue into   Guru made up their mind, they were kicking us off the site.

They also could not grasp the fact that was a client of Cyber Sprocket Labs, NOT part of Cyber Sprocket Labs.   We brought to because we told them how great we thought was.  Maybe we were wrong, but that was our thought at the time. In 5+ years we NEVER had a problem with, often worked with good vendors, and rarely with bad clients.

No Explanation Good Enough

No matter how we tried to explain the situation, or offered to send evidence that the companies are truly separate, didn’t want to hear it.    We even spoke with and their CEO agreed to talk to about the situation. CEO Email
Can you have them call me?
How can the account have anything to do with you?
– Joe Owner would NOT consider the case saying “we do not see the benefit in talking with Joe Owner” (Joe Owner is our pseudonym for the owner of the company).  Their response was  that we must reverse the chargeback.  Sorry, but we cannot do that.  Only can do that.    We have no authority because it is not our card.  We did not initiate the chargeback. Julie at didn’t care.   As with our client and the extortion case, it was not Guru’s problem. CEO Email


Good afternoon. I apologize for the inconvenience. I received your email with Joe Owner’s message. I do not see the benefit in talking with Joe Owner unless he was willing to retract the chargeback; that is the only way we can reconsider reinstating your accounts. A chargeback is a violation of our Terms of Service and anyone and associates taking such action cannot be allowed on our platform.

I have contacted your Employers (Project ID: 604703 and 119413) regarding the outstanding payments. You are free to work with them outside If they decide to pay you via for the outstanding Escrow and Invoice, we will forward the payment to you. If not, we will return the payment in Escrow to the Employer.

I will inform you when I hear from your Employer as to what they decide to do with regards to the payments.

Julie Team Focuses On Their Profits

One thing is certain, has made it very clear where their priorities are these days.  The shift in corporate mentality is obvious. What was once a mission to provide fairly priced high quality consulting services has now become a mission to make more money for

How do we know this?  For starters, they allow a vendor to stay online after documented extortion (that makes money for yet kick us off for being very loosely associated with a chargeback ( loses money).

Secondly, has made a very notable policy change that goes into full effect this July.   They are changing a well-designed and well-liked ranking system based heavily on ratings and past performance to a system based purely on revenue earnings.   That means someone that does poor work but can close $10,000 in deals because they are low priced ranks higher than someone that does great work but only generates $5,000 in income.    Ask any of the top-rated vendors on what they think about the system & they’ll tell you its a bad idea. Policy Change Notice

Thus, the very concept of Rank hinders the success of the majority in favor of a select minority – regardless of which factor is used for the primary sort.  In contrast, genuinely wants every Freelancer to have an opportunity to be a winner – not just a select few.

So What Will Change on May 8?

Guru Freelancers can expect to see initial adjustments for the removal of Rank beginning in Guru search results and on Freelancer profiles:

  • As a first step, we will begin sorting search results by earnings as a default. A new option will also be provided to allow results to be re-sorted by Reviews. Of the available options, a default sort by earnings provides the best view of the health, vitality and promise of Guru Freelancers due to its natural display of financial success and high quote submission activity.

  • Quality Scores and Rank numbers will no longer be visible to Employers. Both will be removed from your profiles and from the search results. Instead, your reviews and feedback ratings will be better featured to summarize your performance history to prospective Employers in a more familiar format.

Source: website June 14th, 2010 (

It can’t be made any more obvious, is putting the emphasis on your ability to make them rich.  They are trying to say this is to give “new consultants just getting started a chance to compete”.  Really?  We had a zero rating and no earnings at one point as well.  We got started just fine and made it to the top 25.   That was with a ranking system based on quality first., it is clear, you are all about the money.  Quality consultants be damned.

What Next?

So what do we do now?  Nothing with it seems.  They flatly refuse to try to resolve the situation.  Regardless of the thousands of dollars in revenue we’ve produced for them, they insist we are somehow responsible for the $690 they lost because they allowed clear and blatant extortion to happen within their system.

Luckily we have a very good client base already and are growing without the help of  There are also plenty of other venues out there that have improved significantly since the days back in 2005 when we started on   New leads and new contracts will come in by word-of-mouth and through sites such as Elance. and oDesk.

Even if were to ask us back, we’re not sure we’d go back.   What was once a thriving, well-run community is now quickly sliding down the slope into mediocrity or worse.

Have you had good or bad experiences with  Feel free to share.  We’d love to hear your stories as well.

5 thoughts on “What’s Wrong With

  1. Here is a follow-on messages spurred by a private message sent by another consultant that read this article.

    Guru has a great platform, I prefer it over the competitors. However their personnel including management is absolutely clueless. It was shocking to me that after a great track record spanning 5 years that they absolutely refused to listen to anything we had to say about the situation. They simply could not comprehend what we explained to them and made it very clear that they are concerned with only one thing when it comes to the community – THEIR MONEY.

    You will find plenty of stories from both sides of the table where people complain about Guru. Buyers complain about sellers. Sellers complain about buyers. BOTH complain about how Guru does not support them or help them out. Truth is, Guru does not support EITHER of them, they only support whomever is putting money in their coffers at the particular moment the problem occurs.

    Personally I am glad they locked us out. It forced me to re-evaluate how we obtained our leads. We’ve taken a different approach that has led to stronger relationships that are much more profitable. Guru attracts clients that want things done CHEAPLY. We prefer clients that want things done RIGHT. Since leaving Guru and forcing us to take the time to locate & cultivate quality leads our pipeline has increased 100% and our profit-per-project by 25%.

    Good luck with Guru & thanks for writing.

    1. I wish I had investigated and read about Guru before I started. What a mess. These people did the same thing to me. The Guru Vendor at the end of the project says he can’t finish it. I go back and disputte to get my money. They said no way and took my money. This is serious highway robbery. Please do not use Guru you are in for a surprise

  2. Thanks for taking the time to post this thoughtful article. I have to say, I have found to be much LESS personal than Guru, but hey don’t tell them. They are all a bunch of crooks, just like the majority of clients I pick up there.
    However there are always those clients that really want to do the right thing. A few of these can make a big difference in your business.
    I would say to those who are concerned with the right thing: Don’t stop. Do your best, and remember to consciously avoid worry and trust God to take care of you. The criminals will get theirs in the long run.

  3. I was scammed on and came over to Guru and found the company who had had their account shut down on Elance, fully active on Guru have refused to take any action as the scamming happened on another site. So by using their logic, a man can murder someone in France, then come to Canada and live happily ever after without any consequences. The world doesnt work like that. I emailed them, contacted them on Facebook, and Twitter. I even messaged the CEO Inder Guglani on Facebook. The emails have stopped, they blocked me on twitter and facebook instead of realising their mistake.

  4. Well, now it’s just getting worse. There are more scams on guru and fewer ways to prevent them. They changed escrow to just “Safepay” and state that it is not an escrow account of any kind. They have stopped updating their FAQ and re-routed all their help and contact links to an “answers” forum that nobody monitors, yet is in full public view. They changed the freelancer side of things entirely in mid-December, and many bugs are still reported daily. Nothing works on the site and people are literally offering to do site fixes for free, and making many obvious usability suggestions, but everyone is either ignored or told “it’s not high priority” or they blame Microsoft for all the site problems. And, to make things worse, they are now working on an entire revamp of the employer side of the site, which will no doubt break a thousand more things and what little amount of quality jobs there are now will start to completely disappear. Freelancers pay to use the site, and so are more likely to stick around and report bugs and wait for fixes, but an employer who is there for free will walk away after one second if things don’t work right. It all boils down to one question: Who is running the site? It must be someone who has enough money to do just fine whether the site floats or sinks. There is no staff to speak of… well, like 3 people. Their priorities seem to shift from day to day, with no real plan in mind. No informative announcements are made about upcoming changes, and there are no polls or chances to voice opinions about these changes, they are just sprung suddenly without much thought and definitely no testing, creating breaks in everything in the system from word-wrapping to email to logins to file uploading to profile updating… and on and on. They seem mostly concerned about competing with other sites instead of getting their own to ever function again. Just go to the answers forum and see how they run their site.

Comments are closed.